 Link | Duplicate Media Finder | Similarity | Video Comparer | Duplicate Files Fixer | VisiPics | Duplicate Cleaner | dupeGuru | Auslogics Duplicate File Finder | Awesome Duplicate Photo Finder | Panaustik | Similar Images | Duplicate Video Search | Easy Duplicate Finder | CloneSpy | Anti-Twin | Bytessence DuplicateFinder | DupDetector | Clone Cleaner | DoubleKiller |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested version | 2.0 | 2.2.0 | 1.06.009 | 1.1 | 1.31 | 4.0.5 | 3.8 | 6.1.4.0 | 1.1 | 4.5 | 11/2003 | 16 | 5.6.0.964 | 3.34 | 1.8d | 1.3 | 3.0 | 2.1 | 1.6.2.82 |
| Last update | 29/07/2017 | 12/10/2016 | 16/06/2016 | ? | 2013 | 2017 | 08/02/2016 | 20/06/2017 | 19/10/2012 | ? | 11/2003 | 2017 | ? | 26/03/2017 | 2010 | 07/11/2011 | 30/05/2002 | 02/10/2017 | 07/07/2007 |
| Overall score /150 | 123 | 97 | 89 | 63 | 62 | 60 | 59 | 54 | 53 | 51 | 50 | 49 | 46 | 36 | 36 | 36 | 33 | 27 | 25 |
| Plateform | Win | Win/Mac | Win | Win | Win | Win | Win/Mac/Linux | Win | Win | Win | Win | Win | Win/Mac | Win | Win | Win | Win | Win | Win |
| 32/64 bits | 32/64 | 32/64 | 32/64 | 32/64 | 32 | 32 | 32/64 | 32 | 32 | 32/64 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 |
| Free | No | - | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | - | - |
| Binary file detection | Yes (165s) | No | No | Yes (>2400s) | No | Yes (943s) | Yes (430s) | Yes (600s) | No | No | No | No | Yes (420s) | Yes (650s) | No | Yes (1800s) | No | Yes (1500s) | Yes (3000s) |
| Similar image detection | Yes (117s) | Yes (211) | No | No | Yes (660s) | Yes (650s) | Yes | No | Yes (314s) | Yes | Yes (120s) | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes (760s) | No | No |
| Similar video detection | Yes (51s) | No | Yes (39s) | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes (75s) | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Similar audio detection | Yes (18s) | Yes (136s) | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| English version | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Real time display | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Integrated content visualization | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | No |
| Cache memory | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Ergonomic score /10 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 5 |
| Results readability score /10 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Function score /10 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Performance score /10 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 7 | N.A. | 8 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
| Opinion | The most complete software package available is definitely the most useful. kdo-rg.com | A great software package. It’s a shame that it doesn’t detect binary duplicates. similarity-app.com | The best available if you only want to detect video duplicates. video-comparer.com | Small issues. Visually superb but a bit slow. duplicate-files-fixer.com | Great if you are only looking for video duplicates. | Has a module for audio but only compares tags. | The Windows version is no longer in use. | Great, but a bit slow. | Good duplicate detection, but does not offer a detection threshold setting. | The interface is fantastic, but the test stopped before the end because too long. | Rapid software, but the management of identified duplicates is not very practical. | You have to change too many complicated parameters, to get an uncertain result. | Good, but you need to buy a license every year. | Managing identified duplicate (deletion) is not practical. | The binary comparison is only bit-by-bit, which is extremely slow. The photo detection works but is also very long. | Small problem during installation that was quickly solved. I had to install it on C: Pleasantly surprised by the original presentation of the results in the form of a tree structure. | Slow and very difficult to operate. Very few options find many duplicates. | Finds the binary duplicates but is very slow. | No statistics on duplicates found. Even if duplicates are displayed in real time, you cannot scroll through the results until the end. |