Historique de Les serveurs web légers en alternative à Apache

Mis à jour 12 mar. 2012 11:45:46

Date de création 20 jul. 2011 20:47:55

Alexis le 12 mar. 2012 11:45:46

Extrait: Compare les alternatives à Apache: Cherokee vs Hiawatha vs Lighttpd vs LiteSpeed vs Nginx

Alexis le 12 mar. 2012 11:41:05

Nom: Les serveurs web légers en alternative à Apache

A l'anis le 21 jul. 2011 00:27:35

Extrait: Compare the alternative web servers to replace Apache: Cherokee vs Hiawatha vs Lighttpd vs LiteSpeed vs Nginx

A l'anis le 20 jul. 2011 23:30:55

Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_server_software

A l'anis le 20 jul. 2011 23:11:03

Description

Apache is a very complete and modular web server, but when it comes to performance it might be a little behind, especially to support multiple concurrent connections. This collaborative comparison try to list the alternative web servers, you might consider.

Performance

Any of these web servers will perform better in terms of CPU or memory usage in a highly concurrent scenario.
Some biased resources: http://www.cherokee-project.com/benchmarks.html

Popularity

According to netcraft web server survey, Nginx is the most used from these alternatives, then comes Lighttpd. The other alternatives present here are not listed. http://news.netcraft.com/archives/category/web-server-survey/

Features

All alternatives have almost the same common features, Fast CGI (to support PHP for example), HTTPS (SSL support). The notable differences are on the administration parts, some have an integrated interface to manage easily the web server; other will only rely on command lines and configuration files.

Switching

If you already have an existing Apache installation, before switching to another web server make sure all the features or modules, you are using, can be replaced on the new web server. The next step would be to find a guide to convert your Apache configuration files. The conversion and testing part, will probably be the most consuming task to switch from Apache to another web server.

Keeping Apache in the background

If you really need all the Apache features, you can still run Apache behind Nginx or Lighttpd as a reverse proxy.

Feel free to add any relevant criteria or alternatives to complete the comparison table.

A l'anis le 20 jul. 2011 22:24:05

Editeur: public
Visibilité: public
Liste des éléments (5): Cherokee Web Server, Hiawatha Web Server, Lighttpd, LiteSpeed Web Server, Nginx

A l'anis le 20 jul. 2011 22:22:02

Extrait

Compare web servers to replace Apache: Cherokee vs Hiawatha vs Lighttpd vs LiteSpeed vs Nginx

Description

Before switching to another web server make sure all the features or modules, you are using, can be replaced on the new web server.

Feel free to add any relevant criteria or alternatives to complete the comparison table.

A l'anis le 20 jul. 2011 22:12:03

A l'anis le 20 jul. 2011 22:08:03

Nom: Apache lightweight web servers alternatives
Liste des éléments (10): Boa Web Server, Cherokee Web Server, Hiawatha Web Server, Lighttpd, LiteSpeed Web Server, Nginx, thttpd, nodejs, Perlbal, Mongrel
Liste des critères (25): Nom abrégé, Dernière version, Date de sortie, Licence, Site web, Langage de développement, Fonctionnalités, Authentification, HTTPS, Domaine virtuel, Support CGI, Support FastCGI, ASP.NET, Java Servlets, Server Side Includes, Console d'administration, Support IPv6, Plateformes, Windows, Linux, macOS, Détails des plateformes supportés, Autre, Nom, Mis à jour

Historique des éléments

Cliquer sur la date de mise à jour pour voir l'historique d'un élément.

Nginx	3 jul. 2014 20:55:16
LiteSpeed Web Server	10 fév. 2013 22:47:14
Lighttpd	25 avr. 2012 14:32:46
Hiawatha Web Server	12 mar. 2012 11:44:00
Cherokee Web Server	12 mar. 2012 11:41:05