Code Review Tools

Produits > High-Tech
1
2021-01-21 11:41:38

Feature comparisons between code review systems.

Cricuble vs Codacy vs Phabricator vs PullRequest

CricubleCodacyPhabricatorPullRequestPaladion Code reviewKiln
Site webhttps://www.atlassian.com/software/cruciblehttps://www.codacy.com/https://www.phacility.com/phabricator/https://www.pullrequest.com/https://www.paladion.net/source-code-review-serviceshttps://github.com/Khan/kiln-review
SaaSNonOui or Self-hostedOui or Self-hostedOui or Self-hostedOui
Open sourceNonNonOuiNonNonNon
Tarifs
  • $10 one time payment (up to 5 users)
  • $5500 one time payment (for 100 users)
  • $15 from / user / month (Hosted)
  • Free (Local Install)
  • $20 / user / month (Hosted)
  • $99 from / user / month
Fonctionnalités
RepositoriesSVN, Git, Mercurial, CVS, PerforceGit, Mercurial, SVNGitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket cloud
repository browserOuiOuiOui
file historyOuiOuiOui
file annotationOuiOuiOui
pre-push reviewOuiOuiNon
post-push reviewOuiOuiOui
open review from CLIOuiOuiNon
add multiple changesets to reviewOui- only for pre-pushOui
add non-successive changesetsOuiNonOui
side-by-side comparisonOuiOuiOui
stacked comparisonOuiNonOui
see renamed files in reviewNonOuiOui
see deleted files in reviewNonOuiOui
integrate linterNonOuiNon
integrate unit testsNonOuiNon
monitor checkins to create reviews- limitedOuiNon
approvals needed for code reviewAnyAll
require multiple approvalsNonOui
edit past commentsOuiNon
recognize added vs moved codeOuiNon
Inclure
  • 2013-08-10 16:03:46
    2021-01-21 11:41:38
  • High-Tech
    English
  • Compare Cricuble vs Phabricator vs PullRequest
  • Publique
    Publique
  • Creative Commons License CC-BY-SA 3.0 / GNU FDL
    Gérer les sauvegardes