Feature comparisons between code review systems.
Cricuble vs Codacy vs Phabricator vs PullRequest
Cricuble | Codacy | Phabricator | PullRequest | Paladion Code review | Kiln | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Site web | https://www.atlassian.com/software/crucible | https://www.codacy.com/ | https://www.phacility.com/phabricator/ | https://www.pullrequest.com/ | https://www.paladion.net/source-code-review-services | https://github.com/Khan/kiln-review |
SaaS | Non | Oui or Self-hosted | Oui or Self-hosted | Oui or Self-hosted | Oui | |
Open source | Non | Non | Oui | Non | Non | Non |
Tarifs |
|
|
|
| ||
Fonctionnalités | ||||||
Repositories | SVN, Git, Mercurial, CVS, Perforce | Git, Mercurial, SVN | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket cloud | |||
repository browser | Oui | Oui | Oui | |||
file history | Oui | Oui | Oui | |||
file annotation | Oui | Oui | Oui | |||
pre-push review | Oui | Oui | Non | |||
post-push review | Oui | Oui | Oui | |||
open review from CLI | Oui | Oui | Non | |||
add multiple changesets to review | Oui | - only for pre-push | Oui | |||
add non-successive changesets | Oui | Non | Oui | |||
side-by-side comparison | Oui | Oui | Oui | |||
stacked comparison | Oui | Non | Oui | |||
see renamed files in review | Non | Oui | Oui | |||
see deleted files in review | Non | Oui | Oui | |||
integrate linter | Non | Oui | Non | |||
integrate unit tests | Non | Oui | Non | |||
monitor checkins to create reviews | - limited | Oui | Non | |||
approvals needed for code review | Any | All | ||||
require multiple approvals | Non | Oui | ||||
edit past comments | Oui | Non | ||||
recognize added vs moved code | Oui | Non |
Plus de comparatifs
Commentaires
Laisser un commentaire
S'inscrire Se connecter