Compare the different SIM format described in the specifications: Full-size vs Mini-SIM vs Micro-SIM vs Nano-SIM vs Embedded-SIM.
Thanks to Apple and it's iPhone versions, there is now several SIM sizes used in our smartphones or tablets. The iPhone 4 made the microSIM size widely used, several other manufacturer adopted this format. Now the iPhone 5 introduced the NanoSIM size, which is even smaller.
The iPhone XS and iPhone XR introduced the eSIM format along a NanoSIM to support dual SIM.
To have a visual size comparison of the SIM formats, don't forget to click on the chart icon in the top left corner of the table.
| Height | Width | Depth | Front view | Same contact as full size | Form factor | Standard reference | Devices using it | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full-size | 85.6 mm | 53.98 mm | 0.76 mm | Yes | 1FF | ISO/IEC 7810:2003, ID-1 | (credit card size) | |
| Mini-SIM | 25 mm | 15 mm | 0.76 mm | Yes | 2FF | ISO/IEC 7810:2003, ID-000 | Early mobile phones | |
| Micro-SIM | 15 mm | 12 mm | 0.76 mm | Yes | 3FF | ETSI TS 102 221 V9.0.0, Mini-UICC | iPhone 4 | |
| Nano-SIM | 12.3 mm | 8.8 mm | 0.67 mm | ![]() | Yes | 4FF | ETSI TS 102 221 V11.0.0 | iPhone 5 |
| Embedded-SIM | 6 mm | 5 mm | 1 mm less than | No soldered | JEDEC Design Guide 4.8, SON-8 | iPhone XS, iPhone XS Max, iPhone XR |
Public
Public It's free and fast to publish data into original tables
Create a table
More comparisons
Comments
The ORBITEL 901 was one of the first "mobile" phone to use sim cards:
https://www.imei.info/phonedatabase/16095-orbitel-901/
But this website says it use the mini-SIM formats.
The full-size format is the default smart card dimensions. It might not have been used inside a real phone.
Leave a comment